Last updated on 2025-12-29
Genre(s) – Drama, Fantasy
Director – Mike Flanagan
Writer – Mike Flanagan
Cast – Tom Hiddleston, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Karen Gillan, Mia Sara, Carl Lumbly, Benjamin Pajak, Jacob Tremblay, and Mark Hamill.
Runtime – 111 Minutes
My Rating – ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐½☆☆
Where To Watch/Stream The Life of Chuck
The Life of Chuck is both touching and a little frustrating. But also, what did I just watch?
The Life of Chuck is a deeply emotional, sometimes messy, occasionally brilliant film that probably isn’t for everyone.
Plot Summary of The Life of Chuck (Spoiler-Free)
The Life of Chuck is based on a novella by the great Stephen King, though don’t go in expecting haunted houses or killer clowns. This is a quieter, more reflective King story, and Mike Flanagan (of The Haunting of Hill House fame) leans all the way into that mood.
The film plays out in reverse chronological order, starting at the “end of the world” and gradually working backwards to the beginning of Chuck’s life.
We meet Marty (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a middle school teacher trying to carry on as the world slowly collapses around him – natural disasters, weird cosmic stuff, people just giving up and accepting that things are ending.
But throughout all this, Chuck Krantz (Tom Hiddleston) starts appearing everywhere, such as on billboards, park benches, and commercials, thanking him for “39 Great Years!”
No one seems to know who he is or why he’s popping up in every possible media outlet, and then, as the film moves backwards, we finally meet Chuck himself, first as a full-grown adult, then as a kid and teen.
Through these glimpses, we see the key moments that shaped his short life, from childhood with his grandparents (played by Mark Hamill and Mia Sara) to some sweet, quiet moments of joy, fear, and very normal human stuff.
It’s not a loud story, and there’s no central “plot twist” or mystery to solve, as it’s more like a collage of memories arranged in reverse, and you’re just meant to feel your way through it.
The Life of Chuck Review: Is It Worth Watching?
There are parts of this movie that I really liked, such as a dance scene in the middle of a highway that somehow felt like a celebration and a goodbye at the same time, and a child version of Chuck playing drums with everything he has, while his grandpa begs him to take life seriously.
Those moments in particular hit.
But there are also parts that feel, well, kind of hollow, like they’re trying to be deep and emotional but didn’t earn it, and sometimes it felt like the film wanted me to cry without giving me enough reason to.
And it almost worked. Almost. .
The film is divided into three acts, told in reverse order. That structure is either brilliant or pretentious depending on your patience level. I liked the idea though, and Flanagan clearly loves playing with time and memory, but it also sometimes made it harder for me to connect.
Tom Hiddleston does a great job with what he’s given though, which isn’t a ton of screen time, ironically, and he plays Chuck with this quiet warmth, like someone who’s not trying to be noticed but also feels deeply, and you kind of want to hug him.
The supporting cast is solid too, with Mark Hamill and Mia Sara bring real charm to the grandparents, and Chiwetel Ejiofor gives a grounded, funny, sad performance that really anchors the first act.
The humor is also a highlight, and while it’s not laugh-out-loud stuff, there are definitely moments that break everything up with a well-timed awkward conversation or a weird moment – and look out for David Dastmalchian, who has a tiny role but manages to make it hilarious and a little heartbreaking.
But, if you’re in the right mood, The Life of Chuck is a film I would still recommend you watch.
It’s like one of those films you watch when you’re already thinking about your childhood, or your own mortality, or the fact that time is just an illusion.
It might frustrate you, but it might also break your heart in a good way.
What I liked (And What I Didn’t Like)
Pros
Tom Hiddleston’s Performance
He doesn’t get a huge chunk of time, but when he’s there, he’s great, and he plays Chuck like someone who’s trying not to leave a mark, and it’s heartbreaking. r.
Story Structure
The backwards storytelling was a bold move, anmd it keeps you curious and gives the film a kind of dreamlike quality.
Emotional Honesty
The film doesn’t sugarcoat life.
Strong Supporting Cast
Mark Hamill and Mia Sara are lovely as Chuck’s grandparents. Hamill especially balances being gruff and protective with genuine warmth.
Moments of Pure Joy
There are a few scenes that felt like short bursts of happiness, like, real, human joy, and those moments reminded me of childhood and how simple things can feel huge when you’re young.
Thoughtful Direction
Flanagan clearly put a lot of thought into how this story should look and feel.
Makes You Reflect
It’s one of those films that sneaks up on you later, and I am still thinking about it now.
Cons
Not Enough Time with Adult Chuck
For a movie about Chuck, we don’t get enough time with Chuck.
Tries a Bit Too Hard at Times
Some of the emotional beats do feel a bit unearned. Like it wants you to cry, but sometimes it doesn’t quite justify the tears.
Pacing Is All Over the Place
The reverse structure means the film starts slow, gets slower, and then finally speeds up near the end. It’s a weird rhythm that might lose some of you early on. You really have to commit.
May Confuse More Than It Moves
If you’re not already on the film’s wavelength, it can feel like a puzzle missing a few key pieces, and you’re be left squinting at the screen trying to figure out what you’re supposed to be feeling.
Who might like The Life of Chuck
- Fans of character-driven dramas
- People who enjoyed Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind or Synecdoche, New York
- If you like emotional, introspective storytelling
- Fans of Mike Flanagan
- Anyone looking for a film that’s more about feelings than plot
- Those who enjoy unusual narrative structures
- People in an existential mood on a rainy Sunday
Who might dislike The Life of Chuck
- Anyone expecting horror or suspense from Stephen King
- People who want a clear, straightforward story
- If you don’t like slow pacing
- Those who get frustrated by unanswered questions
- People who don’t care for abstract or symbolic storytelling
- People in the mood for something light and easy
Final Verdict: Did I Enjoy Watching The Life of Chuck?
Yes. Even if I didn’t always get it, even if I rolled my eyes at a few moments, and even if I wanted more from the characters, I still found myself thinking about it after watching it.
Not always cleat, but it tried something different and mostly pulls it off, and I respect that.
The Life of Chuck Trailer
Simon Leasher
A lover of cinema for over 35 years, I have watched many films from around the world in many different genres, yet I still normally always come back to trashy slasher horror films when in doubt. More
And yes, The Godfather 2 is better than The Godfather.
Discover more from Simon Leasher Film Reviews
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Be First to Comment