Psycho II
Making a sequel to a masterpiece twenty-three years later should be a disaster.
I don’t know why more people don’t talk about Psycho II, because if you mention it, you will often get blank stares, followed by a cautious “Wait, there was a sequel?”
Yes, there was, actually more than one, but today I just want to talk briefly about the 2nd, because it’s quietly excellent.
Good Points
Anthony Perkins is perfectly unsettling and sympathetic
Caracter-driven tension
Great balance of horror, suspense, and social observation
Faithful to the original while standing on its own
Subtle humor and poignancy
Bad Points
Less iconic than the original, so often overlooked
Watching Norman try to be normal is fascinating.
We see Norman Bates gets released from a mental institution, as he’s been declared sane (I know, right?), but we of course expect him to snap at any moment.
But this film isn’t just about whether he kills again - it’s about whether he can exist socially without everyone treating him like a ticking time bomb.
A lot of sequels, especially in horror, will rely on shock, trying to outdo the previous, but Psycho II leans more on psychology - in watching a man navigate a world that isn’t ready for him - and you feel a constant sense of quiet unease, and at times, it plays out more as a social character study.
It’s incredibly fanscinating to watch.
Anthony Perkins still owns Norman Bates.
You don’t need dramatic flourishes or melodrama to understand Norman’s inner behavior, as a look or a pause is all it takes, and Perkins has this ability where he just lets the character breathe in ways most horror leads don’t get.
He’s terrifying, sympathetic, and utterly human, all at once, and his scenes with Mary are really good to watch as well, as they are tense, awkward, and sometimes sad, where you get a sense of what he’s capable of, but also what he struggles with- you might even feel a tiny flicker of empathy.
It’s clever without trying to be clever.
The movie has nods to Hitchcock’s original without imitating it, as it brings back familiar locations, hints at iconic moments, and respects the legacy, and yet, it adds something new to it all - a quiet study of character, tension, and social expectation.
It’s just smart, calm, and unsettling, and I think that’s what makes it work more than anything, as we watch Norman attempt normalcy, fail, and occasionally succeed, while conveying a thousand emotions with just a single look.
It’s just all perfectly measured.
Final Verdict
Norman Bates is still terrifying, sympathetic, and complicated, and it deserves more love.


Shout-out to Richard Franklin’s direction! A huge fan of Hitchcock (who campaigned to have him visit USC while he was a student there), he directed a nice homage to Rear Window two years before Psycho II - Roadgames, starring Stacy Keach and Jamie Lee Curtis. One of my favorites…and Tarantino’s a fan, too!